About 2000 years ago Eudoxus calculated the Volume of a Cylinder, an inscribed Cone, a Prism, and an inscribed Pyramid to be:
Volume = (Area*)(h)
Volume = 1/3 (Area)(h)
Volume = (Area)(h)
Volume = 1/3(Area)(h)
In modern parlance, how did he arrive at these calculations? Why is the volume of the inscribed figure, Cone or Pyramid, 1/3 the Volume of its "parent" figure, Cylinder or Prism?
If the Prism is a Rectangular Prism in which a Rectangular Pyramid is inscribed, Eudoxus partitioned, for example, the inscribed Rectangular Pyramid with "n" small Rectangles having "x" width and height "h". The total area of the partitioned-inscribed Rectangular Pyramid is the sum of all the areas of its composit Rectangles. Since the measure of Area is expressed in "squared units", i.e., 1 cm X 1 cm = 1 cm 2, the Volume of the inscribed rectangular Pyramid is the Sum of all the "squared composit smaller Areas:
GENERALLY:
There is sn interesting relationship between the Volume a Cylinder, and an inscribed Double Cone and Sphere:
If the height of each figure is equal to "2r" so the the radius of the Sphere is equal to "r", the Volume of the Cylinder and Inscribed Double Cone is:
The remaining 1/3 of the Volume within the Cylinder can be calculated as follows:
Thus, the Volume of a Cylinder is:
|